Why is there no double movement in the 21st century?

Vendredi 17 mai, 16h30, 4e session : Justice et cosmopolitisme en question

Nancy Fraser, professeur à la New School for Social Research de New-York, titulaire de la chaire “Repenser la justice sociale” du Collège d’études mondiales

Fraser indignes bastille

In many respects, today’s crisis resembles the crisis of the 1930s, as described by Karl Polanyi in The Great Transformation. Now, as then, a relentless push to extend and de-regulate markets in labor, nature and finance is destroying livelihoods, rupturing communities, and despoiling nature. Nevertheless, the political response today is strikingly different. In the first half of the 20th century, social struggles surrounding the crisis formed what Polanyi called a “double movement,” as a broad-based, coordinated resistance formed to protect society from the ravages of the market. Today, however, neoliberalism generates no such counter-hegemonic opposition, despite intense but ephemeral outbursts, such as “occupy” and the indignados. Thus, we lack a double movement in Polanyi’s sense. What should we make of this situation? How should we explain and evaluate the non-polanyian character of the political landscape in the 21st century? After assessing some widely cited but unsatisfactory hypotheses, I shall propose an alternative that clarifies the prospects for emancipatory social transformation in the 21st century.

OpenEdition vous propose de citer ce billet de la manière suivante :
Penser global (2 avril 2013). Why is there no double movement in the 21st century? Penser global. Consulté le 18 juillet 2024 à l’adresse https://doi.org/10.58079/ssuk

Vous aimerez aussi...

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

Ce site utilise Akismet pour réduire les indésirables. En savoir plus sur comment les données de vos commentaires sont utilisées.

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search